The Theory of Value Dilemma: A Critique of the Economic Analysis of Criminal Law
نویسنده
چکیده
Criminal law can justly lay claim to being the native domain of law and economics. From Bentham to Becker, no area of law has been more brightly illuminated by the radiance of economic logic. Not coincidentally, in no other area of the law has the conflict between economics and ordinary moral sensibilities been perceived to be so sharp. When we are deciding how to apportion punishment, our instinct is to look backwards: wrongdoers should be condemned in proportion to the reprehensibility of their acts. I’ll call the position that punishment should flow directly from these intuitions intrinsic value retributivism. Economics, in contrast, uses the forwardlooking idiom of deterrence: punishment is justified if and to the extent that it produces a desired state of affairs; if the optimal degree of punishment so derived is out of synch with intuitions about the reprehensibility of a particular crime, so much the worse for those intuitions. My goal in this essay is to demonstrate that economic analysis lacks the conceptual resources needed to criticize intrinsic value retributivism in this fashion. The economic theory necessarily presupposes some theory of value that tells us what states of affairs we are trying to maximize through punishment. To construct that theory, the members of a community must consult their shared intuitions. Once a theory of value so derived is plugged into deterrence theory, however, the results won’t differ in any material respect from the ones the law would produce if informed explicitly by intrinsic value retributivism. This claim, which I’ll call the theory of value dilemma, can be reduced to three sub-claims. The first is that the economic analysis of criminal law depends on an externally specified theory of value; without some account of what state of affairs the law is trying to maximize, the consequentialist logic of deterrence can’t get off the ground. Second, this theory of value is essentially political; that is, there’s nothing internal to an economic approach that justifies discounting the valuations implicit in the decisions of a democratic political community’s legal institutions, and hence nothing internal to economics that forecloses political advocacy of any particular theory of value. And the third and final sub-claim is that these politically derived evaluations will, as a practical and conceptual matter, always dominate the distinctive normative components of the economic theory of deterrence. I’ll discuss each of these points in turn.
منابع مشابه
The Definition of Jaefe in Feqh and Criminal Law (Critique and correction propose of the article 711 of IPC)
Introduction: Reports of criminal cases in injuries reveal a great deal of ambiguity of the judicial experts and forensic medicine concerning the injury of Jaefe. This is due to the definition of Jaefe in the Law. The place of Jaefe in body, the tools of Jaefe Injuries, and the degree of penetration of tool in the place are the factors that should be explained to discover the nature of Jaefe. A...
متن کاملAnalysis of Postmodern Criminology with the Controversy of Criminal Law and Islamic Ethics
Background and Aim: The process of theoretical approaches in explaining crime throughout the history is indicative of various interpretations of crime. In 1980s, in the light of French and German schools of thought, the post-modern movement arouse just because they have a new interpretation of the concept of crime within the domains of criminal justice. It was mainly believed that crime was the...
متن کاملCriminological Analysis of the Anti-Smuggling of Goods and Currency Law "Adopted in 1392"
Smuggling commodities and currencies, as a social and economic phenomenon, have very adverse economic effects. The smuggling of goods and the importance of fighting them, organizing the status of border exchanges, moving towards a transparent economy and adapting the behavior of regulatory bodies are among the most important operational axes to combat smuggling of goods. In this article, after ...
متن کاملبررسی رویکرد ابزارگرا به حقوق کیفری ایران در پرتو قانون اساسی
Based on the theory of instrumentalism, criminal law is instrument to Serve the predetermined purposes, and If can make our to achieving these ends, then it is considered correct, But if the purposes fail to be appropriate, In that case is an inefficient and inadequate instrument and should be revised in using of that. Then, The first step in the instrumental study into iranian criminal law is ...
متن کاملThe Study and Investigation of Law and Morality in Medical and Sanity Caring
Introduction: Considering the importance of health and protection of patients' rights, it is clear that addressing the status and relationship of ethics in addition to the relevant laws in the direction of medical and health care has a unique value and quality; Therefore, the purpose of studying this study is to critique the status of medical ethics and its effects and its relationship with the...
متن کامل